| Peer-Reviewed

Health Documentation in the Age of Information Systems

Received: 15 July 2015     Accepted: 27 July 2015     Published: 11 August 2015
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Theoretical background: Health documentation is historically gained such an important legal document for the exercise of individual rights becomes increasingly important role. Domestic legislation but health records as legally significant collection of medical data and documents are not defined. Retention of important legal documents, therefore, it left to the operator. Methods: Using the prescriptive method will be determined and the laws governing the management of health documentation, safety and accessibility of health care documents. Based on descriptive methods will be described handling of health records within a provider of health treatment to exposed regulatory gaps in the protection of individual rights. Results: Through the analysis of the behavior of operators with health records, even after death, leaving the contractor will be the inductive reasoning carried out conclusions on the management of health records. Discussion and conclusions: Health data, in particular documents, which are to protect the individual rights relevant health records are not processed in modern technology. Health records are still kept manually, records of the documents in the collection are not allowing their disposal. Even the flow of health records in a medical institution is not defined. Manual and thus not trasparent data processing treatment consequently forms the basis for alienation of individual records or entire medical documentation and access by unauthorized persons. Due to the diversification of health data within a single controller comes to redundancy investigations, which increases costs and unnecessary divergence of time adequate medical treatment

Published in Communications (Volume 3, Issue 3)
DOI 10.11648/j.com.20150303.12
Page(s) 63-70
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2015. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Health Records, Security, Dispersion Data

References
[1] BANNER Olivia. 2012 in the Medical Futures lab. Nov. 09.2012. URL:www.medicalfutureslab.org/2012/11/09/what-can-the-history-of-medical-records-teach-us-about-meaningful-use-guest-blog-post-by-olivia-banner/:1.6.2014
[2] Clark E. David. Medical privacy at risk in Georgia,2010. URL: http://www.ajc.com/news/news/opinion/medical-privacy-at-risk-in-georgia/nQhZQ/13.6.2015
[3] FLIS Vojko. Medicine and pravo.1996,1998.1999: 233rd
[4] History of medical record-keeping, 2011. URL.http://www.magicandmedicine.hps.cam.ac.uk/on-astrological-medicine/further-reading/history-of-medical-record-keeping.4.9.2014
[5] KERSNIK Janko. Problem-oriented documentation in general medicine. Medical views 1994; 33: 223-40.
[6] KRUŠIČ MATE Zana. The right to privacy in medicine. GV založba.Ljubljana, 2010.
[7] LEACH Philip. Taking a judgment to the European Court of Human Rights. Second edition. Oxford. 2005th
[8] MC Ian Whinney. R. Records and A texbook of Family Medicine, the 1989th
[9] MC Ian Whinney. R. Records and A texbook of Family Medicine. Second edition. The Oxford University Press (MA P), New York, 1997.
[10] Proposal of the Law on databases in the health sector (ZZPVZ-1). URL: http://www.mz.gov.si/fileadmin/mz.gov.si/pageuploads/javna_razprava_2011/jr_zakon_o_evidencah_260811/zakon_o_evidencah_jr_260811.pdf: 07.03.2014.
[11] Regulation on administrative operations. Official Gazette of RS, no. 20/2005 of 3 3 2005th
[12] Instructions for work with classified information of NATO
[13] The Law on the protection of documents and archives and the archives (ZVDAGA). Official Gazette of RS, no. 30/2006 of 23 3, 2006.
[14] The judgment of the ECtHR McGlinchey and others v. The United Kingdom.Opr. No 50390/99. URL: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-61058.:2.9.2014.
[15] The Judgment of the Higher Court in Ljubljana in case I Cp 2835/2009. URL: http://www.sodisce.si/znanje/sodna_praksa/visja_sodisca/64866/:1.9.2014.
[16] Law on the protection of personal data. (ZVOP-1-UPB-1) Official Gazette of RS, no. 86/04 with subsequent monitoring. and supple.
[17] WEED Lawrence L. Medical Records That guide and teach And England Journal of Medicine, the 1968th
[18] The judgment of the ECtHR in Amann Swicherland ref. No. 27798/95. URL: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-58497: 01/09/2014
[19] The Law on Personal Identity Card (ZOIzk-1) Official Gazette of RS, no. 35/2011 of 13 5th 2011th
[20] The Law on Medical Services official consolidated text (ZZdrS-UPB3). Official Gazette of RS, no. 72/2006.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Milena Marinič. (2015). Health Documentation in the Age of Information Systems. Communications, 3(3), 63-70. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.com.20150303.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Milena Marinič. Health Documentation in the Age of Information Systems. Communications. 2015, 3(3), 63-70. doi: 10.11648/j.com.20150303.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Milena Marinič. Health Documentation in the Age of Information Systems. Communications. 2015;3(3):63-70. doi: 10.11648/j.com.20150303.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.com.20150303.12,
      author = {Milena Marinič},
      title = {Health Documentation in the Age of Information Systems},
      journal = {Communications},
      volume = {3},
      number = {3},
      pages = {63-70},
      doi = {10.11648/j.com.20150303.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.com.20150303.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.com.20150303.12},
      abstract = {Theoretical background: Health documentation is historically gained such an important legal document for the exercise of individual rights becomes increasingly important role. Domestic legislation but health records as legally significant collection of medical data and documents are not defined. Retention of important legal documents, therefore, it left to the operator. Methods: Using the prescriptive method will be determined and the laws governing the management of health documentation, safety and accessibility of health care documents. Based on descriptive methods will be described handling of health records within a provider of health treatment to exposed regulatory gaps in the protection of individual rights. Results: Through the analysis of the behavior of operators with health records, even after death, leaving the contractor will be the inductive reasoning carried out conclusions on the management of health records. Discussion and conclusions: Health data, in particular documents, which are to protect the individual rights relevant health records are not processed in modern technology. Health records are still kept manually, records of the documents in the collection are not allowing their disposal. Even the flow of health records in a medical institution is not defined. Manual and thus not trasparent data processing treatment consequently forms the basis for alienation of individual records or entire medical documentation and access by unauthorized persons. Due to the diversification of health data within a single controller comes to redundancy investigations, which increases costs and unnecessary divergence of time adequate medical treatment},
     year = {2015}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Health Documentation in the Age of Information Systems
    AU  - Milena Marinič
    Y1  - 2015/08/11
    PY  - 2015
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.com.20150303.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.com.20150303.12
    T2  - Communications
    JF  - Communications
    JO  - Communications
    SP  - 63
    EP  - 70
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2328-5923
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.com.20150303.12
    AB  - Theoretical background: Health documentation is historically gained such an important legal document for the exercise of individual rights becomes increasingly important role. Domestic legislation but health records as legally significant collection of medical data and documents are not defined. Retention of important legal documents, therefore, it left to the operator. Methods: Using the prescriptive method will be determined and the laws governing the management of health documentation, safety and accessibility of health care documents. Based on descriptive methods will be described handling of health records within a provider of health treatment to exposed regulatory gaps in the protection of individual rights. Results: Through the analysis of the behavior of operators with health records, even after death, leaving the contractor will be the inductive reasoning carried out conclusions on the management of health records. Discussion and conclusions: Health data, in particular documents, which are to protect the individual rights relevant health records are not processed in modern technology. Health records are still kept manually, records of the documents in the collection are not allowing their disposal. Even the flow of health records in a medical institution is not defined. Manual and thus not trasparent data processing treatment consequently forms the basis for alienation of individual records or entire medical documentation and access by unauthorized persons. Due to the diversification of health data within a single controller comes to redundancy investigations, which increases costs and unnecessary divergence of time adequate medical treatment
    VL  - 3
    IS  - 3
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Sections